Source Code Review Form ======================= (version 1.3) Date: 2006-05-17 1 Identification JG-2006-05-17-0: Bugfix: Jobs with negative -p priority were rejected by sge_qmaster. Issue: 2055 Bugtraq: 6424565 Fixed a memory leak in execd job request verification. Enhancem.: Jobs with positive -p priority submitted by a non operator user are rejected. In earlier versions, the priority is silently set to 0. Testsuite: Enhanced checktree/system_tests/clients/qsub. Review: RD 2 Conforms to specification 2 [x] yes 2 [ ] no - comment: 3 Documentation 3.1 user/admin guide OK, or doc CR filed? 3.1 [x] yes 3.1 [ ] no - comment: 3.2 man pages (user view) correct? 3.2 [x] yes 3.2 [ ] no - comment: 3.3 -help output correct and complete? 3.3 [x] yes 3.3 [ ] no - comment: 3.4 documented interfaces (at least GDI, EVI, libs, ADOC format) correct, updated? 3.4 [x] yes 3.4 [ ] no - comment: 3.5 messages, output formats and defines OK? 3.5 [x] yes 3.5 [ ] no - comment: 3.6 Bugster CR complete and correct? 3.6 [x] yes 3.6 [ ] no - comment: 3.7 Issuezilla entry (if exists) complete and correct? 3.7 [x] yes 3.7 [ ] no - comment: 4 Source review 4.1 Style guide conformance 4.1 [x] yes 4.1 [ ] no - comment: 4.2 Memory leaks 4.2 [x] yes 4.2 [ ] no - comment: 4.3 Thread safe 4.3 [x] yes 4.3 [ ] no 5 Tests 5.1 Used memory leak debugger 5.1 [x] yes 5.1 [ ] no - comment: 5.2 Manual tests Description: Manually tested qsub -p in a number of variations. Successfull execution 5.2 [x] yes 5.2 [ ] no - comment: 5.3 Testsuite covers issue 5.3 [x] yes 5.3 [ ] no - comment: 5.4 If 5.3 = no: New testsuite test or module test created? 5.4 [ ] yes, path: 5.4 [ ] no - justification: 5.5 If 5.4 = no: Testsuite issue created? 5.5 [ ] yes, id: 5.5 [ ] no - justification: 5.6 Testsuite run successfull 5.6 [x] yes 5.6 [ ] no - comment: 6 Comments 7 Accepted 7 [x] yes 7 [ ] no - comment: